So what's the longest distance you have driven on a single tank.
Share engine type, distance and mpg if you recorded it.
3.6, 497 miles.
Share engine type, distance and mpg if you recorded it.
3.6, 497 miles.
I have numerous times, even contacted corporate. There's "nothing wrong" with the vehicle. I seriously think people here are full of sht with their MPG.I would think that if you return it to your dealer enough times that you would be able to get Dodge to buy it back under the lemon law.
Same thing happened on my chargers.I cant believe everyone with a RT is getting at least 50 more miles per tank than my GT. WTF?
If you want, I can show you actual data - my Durango will be 7 years old on May 1, I fill it up every time, and have tracked every fill up. I have recorded date, mileage, miles driven, fuel amount, cost, and price per gallon for every one. I don't pay attention to the EVIC MPG, it is generally optimistic by 1-2 mpg. In those (almost) 7 years, and 178,800 miles, I've averaged 19.68 mpg, that's about a 60/40 split of highway/city driving. My best tankful got 26.1 mpg.I seriously think people here are full of sht with their MPG.
My evic about the same, which means I'm averaging 14mpg. Yup, that's on a V6. Today I am doing a 350 mile trip, 90% HWY. I will reset evic, and calculate manually. Lets see what the best I can do. I bet I don't even make the full trip on one tank.If you want, I can show you actual data - my Durango will be 7 years old on May 1, I fill it up every time, and have tracked every fill up. I have recorded date, mileage, miles driven, fuel amount, cost, and price per gallon for every one. I don't pay attention to the EVIC MPG, it is generally optimistic by 1-2 mpg. In those (almost) 7 years, and 178,800 miles, I've averaged 19.68 mpg, that's about a 60/40 split of highway/city driving. My best tankful got 26.1 mpg.
This makes some sense, but what about all the people claiming the much better MPG on their v6's??Same thing happened on my chargers.
My sons gt v6 was getting 14-15 and my scat pack charger was getting 17.
That v6 struggles to move such a heavy car or vehicle and has no mode other than v6... the 392 and the 5.7 both have 4 cylinder mode. On the scat lack it actually makes a difference.
On my Durango rt I was averaging 16 driving easy with a mix it city and highway but I sold it already and got a Widebody charger two weeks ago... It averages more than my Durango did somehow lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t know but so many variables factor is, it’s hard to compare.This makes some sense, but what about all the people claiming the much better MPG on their v6's??
don’t drive so fasterI cant believe everyone with a RT is getting at least 50 more miles per tank than my GT. WTF?