Dodge Durango Forum banner
21 - 40 of 174 Posts
I said that since he said he’d have a Durango Hellcat if it had 7 seats. So, if he can afford a Durango Hellcat, then a 682hp Escalade V with standard 7 seating is certainly compatible (albeit slightly more expensive).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ollie Crow
Discussion starter · #24 ·
Very different vehicles indeed. I did have a CTS-V for a while though back in 2009, excellent ride! I’m sure the Escalade V is just as well done, but it is just too big. We did consider a Wagoneer as well, took one home for a weekend. The Hurricane 6 is a great motor! It was also too big though, and of course, not sporty at all.

the Durango platform is pretty much exactly what we want, I just can’t get the available power plant and the available seating in the same package. Again, seems like a big oversight by Stellantis … So I took a route which would get us what we want for the least cost.

Not sure why this topic is sparking such a reaction from folks? I’m not worked up, nothing to simmer down from. Just explaining what I’m thinking so the topic can get back on track instead of being focused on the cost or how I’ve justified doing it.

Maybe it’s because it’s a brand new vehicle rather than a 3-5 year old one? Either way, I’m happy to build what we want and don’t see a reason to wait for more miles to be put on.

I guess my best course of action will be to call a few shops which specialize in Mopar tuning and discuss these options. In the end, it’ll be a shop doing most of the work anyway.

I know some folks in the forum have supercharged their 5.7’s, and others have done the 6.4 swap and others have built their NA 5.7 up … I was just hoping to get some input from folks who have done these things so I can be more informed when I do call around.
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Adding a 3rd row to a Hellcat Durango has more resale appeal than a modded regular Durango.

Also welding in everything needed for a 3rd row Durango is much easier.
Very true about the resale ... But I'd be in it for about $110k or so instead of the ~$72k with my current plan ($62k for the TnG Premium + $10k budget for the power plant). In the end, the Hellcat path would have cost a good ~$35k more. If it was turn-key, I probably would have done it though.

There was a time during our search for a new car where we were seriously considering dealing with 6 seats to have the Hellcat. But that week my wife filled all 7 seats in her Grand Cherokee L on multiple occasions and it kind of cemented the decision that we needed to keep with 7.

I'm not too worried about future resale. I tend to look at cars from an enthuiest/hobby perspective, not really an investment perspective. But that's just me, I get not everyone feels that way.

BTW: No welding is needed to add a 3rd row to a 5 seat Durango. Be it either an SRT/HC with the light weight package or the SSV version ... all the mounts are there for the 3rd row components. You just have to remove the bins and swap out the side panels, then source and add all the 3rd row seating components. There is a guy on the forum who did add a 3rd row to his Hellcat. It ran him about $5k or so in parts, and the only thing he wasn't able to get working properly was the 3rd row headrest flip button in the uConnect. He tried with AlfaOBD, and at the dealer, but wasn't able to solve it. That wasn't a deal killer for me but I saw a less costly way to achieve what we wanted. It was $35k cheaper to go for the TnG with an added $10k budget to address the power level afterward.

If Stellantis really does phase out the V8 Hemis, I could see this being one of those vehicles which we end up keeping instead of replacing anyway. So far we have 3 "keepers", this could very well be a 4th if it ends up turning out how I'm hoping ... We'll see though ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: S8ER01Z
I said that since he said he’d have a Durango Hellcat if it had 7 seats. So, if he can afford a Durango Hellcat, then a 682hp Escalade V with standard 7 seating is certainly compatible (albeit slightly more expensive).
I didn’t mean it from a cost perspective… the Escalade V is just a huge vehicle that lacks the handling / sporty feel the Durango has (unibody vs full frame) since it’s more focused on luxury.
 
Adding a 3rd row to a Base SRT Lightweight would have been my suggestion. Or adding a red bench to the SRT Plus/Premium.

But changing the vehicle will be too much added cost over what you've budgeted to modify the 5.7.

I considered the same thing, save the money buying the R/T, then increase the power.

It was very tempting, especially when one Hellcat is about the same cost as two RWD R/Ts.
 
Discussion starter · #29 ·
Adding a 3rd row to a Base SRT Lightweight would have been my suggestion. Or adding a red bench to the SRT Plus/Premium.

But changing the vehicle will be too much added cost over what you've budgeted to modify the 5.7.

I considered the same thing, save the money buying the R/T, then increase the power.

It was very tempting, especially when one Hellcat is about the same cost as two RWD R/Ts.
Oh .... the red leather ... that was another interesting conversation. When we were in our decision making, we realized late in the game that you couldn't get the SRT Premium with black leather anymore :( The wife does love the color red, but wasn't sure what it would be like for interior leather. We used Google quite a bit to look at real pictures and she thought maybe it would be "ok" .. but then we saw one in person and she really didn't like it. That was another negative in going with the SRT which eventually led us to the TnG.

Now the black suede/alcantara SRT seats, those were at the top of the "pro" column in our pros/cons list! Really nice in person .... but ... they don't offer that seating material in a bench, across any model/option configuration :(

Maybe off topic, but does your wife (OP) have a single sister? Asking for a friend...
LOL, actually, she does! But her single sister isn't anything like her. The single sister has driven Honda Accords since the day she got her license and all 32 years since! She sees vehicles as a tool to get from point A to point B ... very different than my wife! Ya ... I definitely got a keeper :)

I already had my 1984 K5 Blazer (one of the keeper vehicles) which I had built for rock crawling (1-ton axles, 4 wheel disc, build 355 roller motor, small lift, big tires, etc, etc ) when we got married nearly 20 years ago. She made a comment way back then that the Blazer is part of the deal ... and if I ever sell it, she goes with it :ROFLMAO:. Actually, just last week, the Blazer was parked in the driveway and the trash pickup guys asked her if we wanted to sell it. She told him she didn't think so, but if I did say yes, that she was part of the package LOL! The guy looked very strangely at her ...

Image
 
Oh .... the red leather ... that was another interesting conversation. When we were in our decision making, we realized late in the game that you couldn't get the SRT Premium with black leather anymore :( The wife does love the color red, but wasn't sure what it would be like for interior leather. We used Google quite a bit to look at real pictures and she thought maybe it would be "ok" .. but then we saw one in person and she really didn't like it. That was another negative in going with the SRT which eventually led us to the TnG.

Now the black suede/alcantara SRT seats, those were at the top of the "pro" column in our pros/cons list! Really nice in person .... but ... they don't offer that seating material in a bench, across any model/option configuration :(



LOL, actually, she does! But her single sister isn't anything like her. The single sister has driven Honda Accords since the day she got her license and all 32 years since! She sees vehicles as a tool to get from point A to point B ... very different than my wife! Ya ... I definitely got a keeper :)

I already had my 1984 K5 Blazer (one of the keeper vehicles) which I had built for rock crawling (1-ton axles, 4 wheel disc, build 355 roller motor, small lift, big tires, etc, etc ) when we got married nearly 20 years ago. She made a comment way back then that the Blazer is part of the deal ... and if I ever sell it, she goes with it :ROFLMAO:. Actually, just last week, the Blazer was parked in the driveway and the trash pickup guys asked her if we wanted to sell it. She told him she didn't think so, but if I did say yes, that she was part of the package LOL! The guy looked very strangely at her ...

View attachment 129265
You definitely got a keeper. 👍🏽
and the Blazer is nice also.
 
Edited my reply above about the VVT. It's only restricted based upon meeting certain RPM and Oil Temps based upon mileage, and it's minimal at that. VVT is fully enabled above the set RPM's though.
On my Challenger RT the tune limited the lower limit of the VVT engagement RPM. I don't have a stock Durango RT tune so can't comment on them. On startup the cam is fully advanced and VVT retards it based on several tables and conditions. Stock tune swings the cam for emissions (EGR).
Image


I have a magnuson SC on my manual RT challenger and what really woke it up was a 6.2 cam and LT headers. With a supercharger you will find that your brakes will need upgrading as well. If you do go with a SC'er don't use the BAP (boost a pump) but instead upgrade the fuel pump. BAPs are known to fail.
 
He has the SRT brakes on his Durango.
Still may want to upgrade, I would. From all the Durango Hellcats I've seen, they have the two-piece rotors and different calipers on the fronts.
Image

I know I'm planning to go to at least two piece rotors on my TnG, but if I can source the HC front calipers, I'll go to them as well. I'll admit, I can't dig up any info to find out what the actual overall difference in the calipers are. It looks like they may just be designed to be less bulky. Anyways, from past experiences, brakes are not something I'll pinch pennies on. I put SRT brakes on my old 2011 v6, and that was one of the best investments I made on that Durango.
 
Discussion starter · #34 ·
On my Challenger RT the tune limited the lower limit of the VVT engagement RPM. I don't have a stock Durango RT tune so can't comment on them. On startup the cam is fully advanced and VVT retards it based on several tables and conditions. Stock tune swings the cam for emissions (EGR).
View attachment 129272
That's the table I remembered. If I'm reading it correctly, it looks as though the PCM is preventing VVT from activating until a particular RPM, given OD mileage and oil temp. So a brand new motor, once up to temp, will activate VVT at 2000 RPM, then after 500 miles, will activate at 1815 RPM, etc ...

I have a magnuson SC on my manual RT challenger and what really woke it up was a 6.2 cam and LT headers. With a supercharger you will find that your brakes will need upgrading as well. If you do go with a SC'er don't use the BAP (boost a pump) but instead upgrade the fuel pump. BAPs are known to fail.
The Maggie is also a positive displacement charger, correct? Curious to your setup ...
  • How much boost are you running, and for how long have you been running it?
  • Did you change anything in the lower end at all?
  • 91/93 Pump gas, or are you doing E85 or meth/water injection, etc ...?
  • I assume you have an intercooler as well, correct?
  • How's the daily driveability ... meaning casual cruising and part throttle behaviors?

Here is the kit I am considering:
Whipple Supercharger Kit: Dodge Durango 5.7L Hemi 2015 - 2021

It includes an intercooler and this drop in fuel pump:

If I go this route, I am considering a drop in forged piston and rod kit, although not sure it's needed if keeping boost levels around 6psi. MMX offers a kit which is stated to be balanced as factory:


Maybe I forego the pistons and rods for now, and just keep the boost low. At a later time, if the itch to raise the PSI is too much, I can do the pistons and rods then and swap the puley?
 
Discussion starter · #35 ·
Still may want to upgrade, I would. From all the Durango Hellcats I've seen, they have the two-piece rotors and different calipers on the fronts.
View attachment 129273
I know I'm planning to go to at least two piece rotors on my TnG, but if I can source the HC front calipers, I'll go to them as well. I'll admit, I can't dig up any info to find out what the actual overall difference in the calipers are. It looks like they may just be designed to be less bulky. Anyways, from past experiences, brakes are not something I'll pinch pennies on. I put SRT brakes on my old 2011 v6, and that was one of the best investments I made on that Durango.
The factory TnG brakes are pretty stout. I've driven some intense road course cars in my time, and I am quite impressed with how well this brake package, along with the 295 tires, can bring the Durango to a stop without engaging ABS. Makes sense the Hellcat has a beefier setup, with 700+ HP on tap ... but I'm thinking around the 500hp range for the setup which is more comparable to the SRT 392.

Image
 
That's the table I remembered. If I'm reading it correctly, it looks as though the PCM is preventing VVT from activating until a particular RPM, given OD mileage and oil temp. So a brand new motor, once up to temp, will activate VVT at 2000 RPM, then after 500 miles, will activate at 1815 RPM, etc ...
Correct

The Maggie is also a positive displacement charger, correct? Curious to your setup ...
  • How much boost are you running, and for how long have you been running it?
  • Did you change anything in the lower end at all?
  • 91/93 Pump gas, or are you doing E85 or meth/water injection, etc ...?
  • I assume you have an intercooler as well, correct?
  • How's the daily driveability ... meaning casual cruising and part throttle behaviors?
  • My current pulley setup gives me ~9.5lb. Been running it since 2017 and pass IL emissions. At the time it cost me $7200 (tuning included) and installed myself. More recently I upgraded front/rear brakes to Wilwood which greatly improves stopping.
  • Stock motor except for 6.2 cam, mopar performance valves springs and comp cam pushrods.
  • 93 Shell. No meth injection.
  • Kit comes with one but eventually want to upgrade.
  • At cruise and PT you don't know it is there. It is very quiet too, hardly hear a whine...but I am running headers with a 3" AWE catback.

BTW with whipples, quiet a few guys complain about a rattle noise at low RPM with the AC on.
 
That's why I said may, as brake performance is a very subjective thing. The reg SRT brakes are pretty stout like you say and do perform very well, not saying they don't. For me, after driving around 7 years with these SRT brakes between my two Durangos, I would like a bit more performance from them, even if it's not a major difference. That's just my preference after having driven through the Rockies, Appalachians, Europe (especially roundabouts), and, more than any reason, the huge amount of people on the roads that aren't paying attention and just pull out in front others. The biggest and most common in recent years, the sheer number of people who are turning right at an intersection and feel they don't have to stop and/or check for traffic when they have a red light. That alone is my biggest reason for wanting the best brakes I can get.

Ultimately, when it comes to brakes, it's not the vehicle HP that matters, but the speed going at and the weight of the vehicle. The HP definitely plays a part in the ability to get to speed. A reg SRT and your TnG, if they dyno'd the exact same HP, does not mean they have the exact same HP throughout the matching RPMs, SC and NA engines perform drastically different with the available HP at varied RPMs. Because of those differences, there may be an advantage in getting to speed, I don't know, haven't seen a SC R/T to Reg SRT comparison. Just my take on it after having had NA/Turbo/SC vehicles.
 
I have seen Maggie's on Vettes and GTOs with excellent results... Now on a Challenger, but I have never seen one on a DD? Who has one that can post comments????
 
Discussion starter · #39 ·
Correct
  • My current pulley setup gives me ~9.5lb. Been running it since 2017 and pass IL emissions. At the time it cost me $7200 (tuning included) and installed myself. More recently I upgraded front/rear brakes to Wilwood which greatly improves stopping.
  • Stock motor except for 6.2 cam, mopar performance valves springs and comp cam pushrods.
  • 93 Shell. No meth injection.
  • Kit comes with one but eventually want to upgrade.
  • At cruise and PT you don't know it is there. It is very quiet too, hardly hear a whine...but I am running headers with a 3" AWE catback.
Great info, thanks man! How many miles have you put on over the 6 years with the Maggie?

BTW with whipples, quiet a few guys complain about a rattle noise at low RPM with the AC on.
Wow! I definitely would not install a Whipple if it'll sound like that. I wonder if they solved it with the Gen 5, especially considering these are now appearing as OEM. I'll have to give Whipple a call and see what they say. If they say it's possible for this noise to happen with the Gen 5 3.0L version, then I'll look elsewhere.

That's why I said may, as brake performance is a very subjective thing. The reg SRT brakes are pretty stout like you say and do perform very well, not saying they don't. For me, after driving around 7 years with these SRT brakes between my two Durangos, I would like a bit more performance from them, even if it's not a major difference. That's just my preference after having driven through the Rockies, Appalachians, Europe (especially roundabouts), and, more than any reason, the huge amount of people on the roads that aren't paying attention and just pull out in front others. The biggest and most common in recent years, the sheer number of people who are turning right at an intersection and feel they don't have to stop and/or check for traffic when they have a red light. That alone is my biggest reason for wanting the best brakes I can get.

Ultimately, when it comes to brakes, it's not the vehicle HP that matters, but the speed going at and the weight of the vehicle. The HP definitely plays a part in the ability to get to speed. A reg SRT and your TnG, if they dyno'd the exact same HP, does not mean they have the exact same HP throughout the matching RPMs, SC and NA engines perform drastically different with the available HP at varied RPMs. Because of those differences, there may be an advantage in getting to speed, I don't know, haven't seen a SC R/T to Reg SRT comparison. Just my take on it after having had NA/Turbo/SC vehicles.
Makes sense. More braking is always a good thing :D When I was racing, my gauge for how good the braking system was in the car I was driving was how bruised by shoulders and chest were after a 20 min track session :ROFLMAO: Threshold braking will certainly beat you up when the braking system is up to task...
 
Great info, thanks man! How many miles have you put on over the 6 years with the Maggie?
I did the SCer when I had ~18Kmiles...now I have 33kmiles. It is not a daily mainly because I can't keep my foot off the go pedal and gas/tires are pricey. Also driving stick in stop-go traffic gets old real quick. When covid let up I filled up at a shell station on St. Patrick's day and was shocked at the $6.20/gallon 93 octane. It's funny I drop some appreciable coin on SCer and brakes but gas prices make my arms shorter and my pockets deeper. BTW even with the 315s I run on the back, if you drive the challenger in sub 60F weather or just the lightest rain, you need to be extra careful taking turns.

One thing I should mention is the 6.2 cam swap cost me just about $1k in parts and tools...reason being is manuals don't have MDS lifters so I don't have to tear off the heads. However swapping in the mopar performance spring (due to added lift) while the heads are still in the engine bay is a major PITA!
 
21 - 40 of 174 Posts