Dodge Durango Forum banner
101 - 120 of 595 Posts
Update on my situation:

My fiancee has a '21 CPO that we bought about 3 months ago and it started throwing the "UCONNECT BOX REQUIRES SERVICE" literally a week after we bought it. I posted on here and @DodgeCares got involved, opening up a case. We took it to the dealer and the problem went away brifely. The issue returned again, but it was during the holidays so we didn't get it back to a dealership immediately and then I had a vacation scheduled. Well, since they hadn't heard from me for a week, Dodge closed the case. Highly annoyed by that. Plus, we've had it back to the dealership 2x more and the error keeps coming back. That alone is frustrating, but about 2 weeks ago I bought a 2023 Durango for myself and it just started throwing this error, too! WTH?? Including my fiancee's car, this is my 8th Durango (plus 4 Ram 1500's over the years) and the treatment of this has me rethinking my loyalty.
Reading through this thread, I wonder if this error is thrown when the integrated cellular device has a poor or no connection to a cellular tower. Maybe the system thinks there's a problem because it cannot connect to a tower?

If so, this would explain why some folks have it recurring across multiple vehicles while others (like myself) have never experienced this with any of my uConnect Stellantis vehicles.

If you live in an area where the provider uConnect uses (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, etc ...) has poor coverage it could explain you having this across multiple vehicles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SRTKITTY
That's what it sounds like to me since bypassing the cellular antenna input can solve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daking747
Reading through this thread, I wonder if this error is thrown when the integrated cellular device has a poor or no connection to a cellular tower. Maybe the system thinks there's a problem because it cannot connect to a tower?

If so, this would explain why some folks have it recurring across multiple vehicles while others (like myself) have never experienced this with any of my uConnect Stellantis vehicles.

If you live in an area where the provider uConnect uses (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, etc ...) has poor coverage it could explain you having this across multiple vehicles.
That’a not a bad theory.. I do live in Charlotte so my cell coverage is better than someone out in a rural part of the world but that’s not to say it’s perfect.

I did just had my wiring and antennae replaced this morning at the dealership. No errors yet but I’ll report back in a few days.
 
That’a not a bad theory.. I do live in Charlotte so my cell coverage is better than someone out in a rural part of the world but that’s not to say it’s perfect.

I did just had my wiring and antennae replaced this morning at the dealership. No errors yet but I’ll report back in a few days.
It could be antennae replacements and connector reseats are resulting in a more sensitive signal allowing for weak coverage to "be enough". Like when your cell phone has one bar and you wave it around looking for a 2nd? LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bb37 and S8ER01Z
It could be antennae replacements and connector reseats are resulting in a more sensitive signal allowing for weak coverage to "be enough". Like when your cell phone has one bar and you wave it around looking for a 2nd? LOL!
That’s very possible, at this point I’ll just be happy if I never see the pop up again in my life.
 
It is not a cellular connection issue to a cell tower. My Durango uses AT&T and for a week late last year I had no internet connection via the ATT cellular data. I complained to AT&T and that went no where. I asked for an AT&T engineer to ping me offline of Nanog and she got me in touch with a AT&T cell engineer and it turned out there was a dead mux in the area and automobile telematics is last inline for connectivity. 2 days later the mux was fixed and I was back in business.

AT&T sucks on the east coast and it is very fitting for Stellantis to use a poor carrier in my area. While I hate Verizon their cellular is superior to AT&T in every way.
 
It is not a cellular connection issue to a cell tower. My Durango uses AT&T and for a week late last year I had no internet connection via the ATT cellular data. I complained to AT&T and that went no where. I asked for an AT&T engineer to ping me offline of Nanog and she got me in touch with a AT&T cell engineer and it turned out there was a dead mux in the area and automobile telematics is last inline for connectivity. 2 days later the mux was fixed and I was back in business.

AT&T sucks on the east coast and it is very fitting for Stellantis to use a poor carrier in my area. While I hate Verizon their cellular is superior to AT&T in every way.
But the tower was up, right? So the Telematics box would log a successful connection to the tower, just not to the cloud service it's trying to reach since data wasn't passing. I wouldn't think a network issue or down service would cause this error, but I could see inability to establish a connection to the tower causing it.

Just a guess on my part though ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vice-White
But the tower was up, right? So the Telematics box would log a successful connection to the tower, just not to the cloud service it's trying to reach since data wasn't passing. I wouldn't think a network issue or down service would cause this error, but I could see inability to establish a connection to the tower causing it.

Just a guess on my part though ...
No there was no connection as the IMEI got rejected due to congestion. I was not even able to use Dodge Care calls or anything that used AT&T.
I do not think these cellular radios inn our Durango's have roaming capabilities either.
For the amount of companies using AT&T, Manage your Connected Car data plan from AT&T I would think a dialing failure (yeah that is what they call it) causing warning messages would be on every forum of these brands. This is a Mopar issue after going to UC5 and that is where it started. I don't think UC4 Durangos, Rams, Pacificas, Jeeps had this issue.
No matter, in 9 years 4G will be gone and there will be nothing we can do just like 3G went away and Dodge sent some bullshit Tmobile OBD adapter that did nothing.

I think the problem is the cable and or connectors. At least 1 connector looks like it was designed by a 3 year old and you would swear it does not even fit right, based on pics I have seen.
I could be completely wrong but having theories is as good as what Dodge has been doing to tackle this issue.
 
It could be antennae replacements and connector reseats are resulting in a more sensitive signal allowing for weak coverage to "be enough".
I deal with radio frequency transmissions pretty much every day. I'm not impressed by the cheesy-looking snap-together connectors I see being used on the "Uconnect box". That would never be allowed in a serious RF environment (broadcast TV or radio tower, public safety repeater system, cellular site, etc.). I assume that these types of connectors are acceptable in the automotive industry because they save assembly time.

If the connectors are not securely seated, they can work loose or develop corrosion on the contacts. Yes, reseating the connectors might "wipe" the contacts and eliminate the corrosion. If the adjacent cables are pulling on the connector they may be displacing the connector mating surfaces. Yes, any movement of the cables or the box might eliminate this force on the connector.

In most RF connections, the loss imposed by the connector increases as the frequency increases. A connector might have acceptable loss at 150 MHz, but the loss might be significant at 1500 MHz. Looking at CellMapper on my Verizon phone, I see connections at 885 MHz, 1980 MHz, and 2175 MHz. I would be very suspicious that the connectors on the Uconnect box are the culprit in many of these Uconnect problems.
 
I deal with radio frequency transmissions pretty much every day. I'm not impressed by the cheesy-looking snap-together connectors I see being used on the "Uconnect box". That would never be allowed in a serious RF environment (broadcast TV or radio tower, public safety repeater system, cellular site, etc.). I assume that these types of connectors are acceptable in the automotive industry because they save assembly time.

If the connectors are not securely seated, they can work loose or develop corrosion on the contacts. Yes, reseating the connectors might "wipe" the contacts and eliminate the corrosion. If the adjacent cables are pulling on the connector they may be displacing the connector mating surfaces. Yes, any movement of the cables or the box might eliminate this force on the connector.

In most RF connections, the loss imposed by the connector increases as the frequency increases. A connector might have acceptable loss at 150 MHz, but the loss might be significant at 1500 MHz. Looking at CellMapper on my Verizon phone, I see connections at 885 MHz, 1980 MHz, and 2175 MHz. I would be very suspicious that the connectors on the Uconnect box are the culprit in many of these Uconnect problems.
That's the point I was trying to make. Networks are multilayered and while a handshake could be successful, the subsequent data transmission could fail. A loose or bad connector causing an increase in resistance on the antennae wire could allow for a successful physical handshake (due to the frequency being used to perform it) but then fail on the data transfer (due to a higher frequency being used).

The same is true for a poor connection to the tower, especially if the connection is intermittently dropping out.

My guess is the error folks are getting is triggered by a failure in the physical or data link layer (ie: layer 1 and 2) and the error handling of the uConnect is seeing this as a hardware failure. Errors in the higher layers should be seen as software issues.

Image
 
I've done a lot of digging but can't seem to find an exact answer. I also have the uconnect error message but it is now coupled with no sound from the stereo at all, rebooting and multiple factory resets have not resolved the no audio problem. Has anyone had the same issues and can anyone say that the the 2 issues are related? Thanks in advance.
 
I’m still hoping a fix is at least work in progress. For as long as this has been an issue I can believe dodge is still treating it like it’s a “one off” issue and not acknowledging that it’s widespread and should be taking seriously.
 
I’m still hoping a fix is at least work in progress. For as long as this has been an issue I can believe dodge is still treating it like it’s a “one off” issue and not acknowledging that it’s widespread and should be taking seriously.
If your Durango is MY21 or newer,, then the fix is a new cable between the telematics box and the cellular modem in the center of the dash.
 
If your Durango is MY21 or newer,, then the fix is a new cable between the telematics box and the cellular modem in the center of the dash.
It’s a 21. I took it in a few months ago and I had a “loose connection”. I’m out of warranty now and can’t afford a trial and error method if the fix isn’t certain.
 
It’s a 21. I took it in a few months ago and I had a “loose connection”. I’m out of warranty now and can’t afford a trial and error method if the fix isn’t certain.

Well let's see. You can take my word for it (for whatever that is worth) and spend a few dollars getting a new antenna and doing it yourself or live with it. However, if you are uncomfortable taking Dodge's latest TSB (where I got my info from) which specifies that cable as the culprit. then you can only live with the issue. @DodgeCares can you help this Daking747 get his/her vehicle fixed that was defective from the factory under warranty since the same issue was reported when in warranty but not fixed?
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: 44410
101 - 120 of 595 Posts