Dodge Durango Forum banner

Stroker Crank Clearance With 5.7 Oil Pan

626 Views 14 Replies 4 Participants Last post by  HEMIWOT
Recently swapped a lower mile engine (from a Ram 1500) into our 2013 Durango R/T and did the MDS delete and 6.4 cam swap and hemifever tune.

While swapping the oil pans, noticed the Ram oil pan has the separate windage tray built into the oil pan gasket, and the Durango oil pan has the windage tray built into the oil pan.

Will the stock Durango oil pan clear a 4.050” stroker crank? If not, will the 6.4 SRT oil pan for a Durango with the 5.7 block? It’s a 6 speed auto AWD if that makes a difference for oil pan swaps.

If the 6.4 pan doesn’t swap in, do you cut out the built in windage tray from the 5.7 oil pan and use a car or truck windage tray/gasket combo for the Stroker crank? Or have to go with an aftermarket pan?

Plan to rebuild the original engine this fall - prefer to give it a few more inches to help make up for the altitude here in Colorado - and allow for future mods too.
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Don't have an answer but apparently there are different windage tray designs to accommodate different strokes on the gen 3 engines. Although what I find interesting is if you look up stroker kits for the 5.7 there is no mention of needing a different windage tray.


.
Brown Bag Rectangle Luggage and bags Font


However, apparently MMX makes a custom windage tray for strokers. You might try contacting them to see if you may need one for your application?
See less See more
Don't have an answer but apparently there are different windage tray designs to accommodate different strokes on the gen 3 engines. Although what I find interesting is if you look up stroker kits for the 5.7 there is no mention of needing a different windage tray.


.
View attachment 126384

However, apparently MMX makes a custom windage tray for strokers. You might try contacting them to see if you may need one for your application?
[/QUOTE
Don't have an answer but apparently there are different windage tray designs to accommodate different strokes on the gen 3 engines. Although what I find interesting is if you look up stroker kits for the 5.7 there is no mention of needing a different windage tray.


.
View attachment 126384

However, apparently MMX makes a custom windage tray for strokers. You might try contacting them to see if you may need one for your application?
Thanks for the reply

I eventually found where the built in windage tray in the Durango oil pan is removable … so at least that opens up some options. Planning on the MMX Stroker kit, so will reach out to them for recommendation/requirements.
When I used to build motors (5.0 Fords and big block Pontiacs)… I used modeling clay to set the depth on oil pump pick ups, etc. Also, usually used Canton oil pans with great success.

Why not install Your set up and hand crank the motor and see if there is any rubbing of reciprocating parts?

Regarding the windage tray, the more coverage the better. On the oil pan, which ever one has the best baffling and deeper sump, that should be your go to if it fits the chassis.
Thanks for the reply

I eventually found where the built in windage tray in the Durango oil pan is removable … so at least that opens up some options. Planning on the MMX Stroker kit, so will reach out to them for recommendation/requirements.
About to do the same thing soon. MMX stroker windage trays should work.
Why not install Your set up and hand crank the motor and see if there is any rubbing of reciprocating parts?
Gonna have to do this anyway to check for and remove clearance issues.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Thanks guys. Since the plan is a full rebuild, any thoughts on Stroker 5.7 vs 6.4 vs Stroker 6.4?
Thanks guys. Since the plan is a full rebuild, any thoughts on Stroker 5.7 vs 6.4 vs Stroker 6.4?
If your goal is the best power at high altitude the 426 will do pretty damn well. I guess it would depend on how much you want to spend. 5.7 stroker will probably do ok for a much lower price not having to get a whole new block+parts.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The age old question… how fast do you want to go and how much money $$$ do you have to spend.

I have always been for “there is no replacement for cubic inch displacement” kind of guy but my little 306 Ford outruns the hell out of 347 and higher motors all day long so combination of parts (heads, cam, compression, gearing etc) are key!
Just trying to build fun into the wife’s daily … she decided she wanted to keep Rango vs getting a car payment.

So, time to put some money into Rango and make it something she’ll want to keep driving … a 411 or 422 pump gas daily sounds about right - understressed and lots of torque to get the heavy beast moving.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Then again, 392 is only 7 1/2 % or so smaller than 422 …
Yeah maybe a low mileage 392 with some mild modifications might work? Seems more cost effective?

Either way, if its the Wife’s ride then reliability and smooth linear power should be your focus.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Step one of this process was putting in a lower mileage 5.7 in with MDS delete and 6.4 cam and hemifever tune (mostly wanted the tune to improve the laziness of the throttle response and transmission shifting - without going to extremes).
Step two will be either a complete rebuild on the original 5.7 or a 392. Costs for rebuilding the heads will be a wash not matter which route I take. Since the cost of rotating assemblies are close - cost per added cubic inches goes down even when factoring the cost of a good 392 core. I’m definitely leaning towards a large motor, good heads, mild cam setup for excellent street manners and good power in a fairly low stressed package.
Step three I guess will be a little body work to clean up a few years of parking lot scars (and the sides of the garage 🤦‍♂️) ….

Best thing is this can be a “pay as you go” process without eating the entire bill at once!
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
While I’m working about 8,000 miles away from the Rango, I bought a few e-books.

The two following clips come from Larry Shepard’s New Hemi Engines: How to Build Max Performance.

Windage tray mods for 4.0 stroke (appears to be 6.4 windage tray according to the images I pulled up on RockAuto - the 5.7 pan is dimpled instead of slotted in the areas of the arrows).


And same for 4.05 stroke:

See less See more
2
  • Helpful
Reactions: 1
While I’m working about 8,000 miles away from the Rango, I bought a few e-books.

The two following clips come from Larry Shepard’s New Hemi Engines: How to Build Max Performance.

Windage tray mods for 4.0 stroke (appears to be 6.4 windage tray according to the images I pulled up on RockAuto - the 5.7 pan is dimpled instead of slotted in the areas of the arrows).
View attachment 127106

And same for 4.05 stroke:

View attachment 127107
So a stock 6.4 windage tray with a little extra work would work? Be saving about $50 or so over the MMX one.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top