I ditched my brembo pads at 4k miles because the dust is awful.
That is an insane price, even by dealer standards.Retail price on front and rear pad are over $1250 plus tax. Here is where I decided to look for a lower cost alternative. Power Stop makes great pads for a fraction of the cost. They provided me with the part #'s of their product and found them on Rockauto delivered to my door for $117 total for all 4 wheels.
The fronts were Z231405 and the rears were Z231053B...both set come complete with new pins, clips, and lubricant. These were more daily driver level pads but are holding up extremely well with virtually no brake dust at all.That is an insane price, even by dealer standards.
Curious, which PowerStop pads did you go with? They have a few different models for the Durango.
Don't blame you it makes a mess. The only thing that makes it worse is if you take it to a car wash and instead of putting them putting the tire dressing with just a brush or applicator they use the bottle with an air hose and spray it on.I ditched my brembo pads at 4k miles because the dust is awful.
I just wanted to say my rear pads are up for replacement at 17k (under 3mm now) and the fronts still have a lot left. I don’t know why that is the case but my rear brakes appear to be wearing quicker than the front as well. 😳To the OP I don't know why your rear pads were worn more than your fronts...but that is not normal. It would only make sense If your car was older/used and previous owner changed front pads only and the rears would be twice as old.
very interesting. On my old 18 SRT I changed front pads once rears were ok after about 18k miles.That vehicle did not have tow package.My HC does have towing( I do not tow yet) so maybe there is something else going on...I will monitor pad wear on the 21..I just wanted to say my rear pads are up for replacement at 17k (under 3mm now) and the fronts still have a lot left. I don’t know why that is the case but my rear brakes appear to be wearing quicker than the front as well. 😳
Yeah I wasn’t expecting this but I have towed a half dozen times now and raced it so I figured maybe my usage had something to do with it. 🤔very interesting. On my old 18 SRT I changed front pads once rears were ok after about 18k miles.That vehicle did not have tow package.My HC does have towing( I do not tow yet) so maybe there is something else going on...I will monitor pad wear on the 21..
My source is a pretty experienced BMW tech. Let me check back with him as I may have misinterpreted what he said and maybe it was a BMW specific comment.To the OP I don't know why your rear pads were worn more than your fronts...but that is not normal. It would only make sense If your car was older/used and previous owner changed front pads only and the rears would be twice as old. Your conjecture that the car is designed to have higher brake force in the rear to reduce front "dive" is incorrect.All cars are designed for more front brake bias..it is safer and allows the driver some control under heavy braking along with abs to steer the vehicle...having too much rear bias would put many drivers in the weeds...Formula 1 drivers are the best in the world and If they get more rear bias even they can spin..
To the OP I don't know why your rear pads were worn more than your fronts...but that is not normal. It would only make sense If your car was older/used and previous owner changed front pads only and the rears would be twice as old. Your conjecture that the car is designed to have higher brake force in the rear to reduce front "dive" is incorrect.All cars are designed for more front brake bias..it is safer and allows the driver some control under heavy braking along with abs to steer the vehicle...having too much rear bias would put many drivers in the weeds...Formula 1 drivers are the best in the world and If they get more rear bias even they can spin..
I have a 2022 TNG with Brembo and have not noticed much of any dust accumulation. Could it be they are using different pads now? Thanks!I ditched my brembo pads at 4k miles because the dust is awful.
Could be. Thanks!!With all the supply chain issues they are experiencing now it would not be surprising if they are using alternative sources of parts.
I have a '22 SRT...so maybe the TnG pads are different...i dunno, but the dust was awful.I have a 2022 TNG with Brembo and have not noticed much of any dust accumulation. Could it be they are using different pads now? Thanks!
Do you use Adaptive Cruise Control frequently? According to some reports, ACC primarily uses the rear brakes for speed control.I just wanted to say my rear pads are up for replacement at 17k (under 3mm now) and the fronts still have a lot left. I don’t know why that is the case but my rear brakes appear to be wearing quicker than the front as well. 😳
I had Z23's with Centric Semi-coat rotors. I think that my pads were defective. They were wake-the-neighbors loud, dusty as hell, and bite was horrible (Panic braking from 50mph wouldn't even get a chirp from the tires or ABS working). I was also getting MASSIVE amounts of brake shudder, and clear pad deposits/imprints on the rotors that only got worse over time. Despite NUMEROUS re-bedding attempts, and living with the noise and annoyance for like 2 years, I finally swapped everything out. Powerstop really stepped up, and I moved to their Z26 pads with their geomet drilled/slotted rotors (plain rotors, which I would have preferred, were out of stock). The 26's have been great so far. Much quieter, very little dust, and much better bite (both cold, and hot).The fronts were Z231405 and the rears were Z231053B...both set come complete with new pins, clips, and lubricant. These were more daily driver level pads but are holding up extremely well with virtually no brake dust at all.
Oddly enough I think there are some vehicles where this is the case. I have a good friend with a C63AMG (RWD) and it uses the rear brakes as part of traction/stability (which the car can't hook up to save itself, it might even use them as a side to side virtual positraction or something) and it goes through them at 15-20k with the rears going faster than the fronts.My source is a pretty experienced BMW tech. Let me check back with him as I may have misinterpreted what he said and maybe it was a BMW specific comment.
Actually I do.. that would make a lot of sense.Do you use Adaptive Cruise Control frequently? According to some reports, ACC primarily uses the rear brakes for speed control.